- Date
- Jun 15–19, 2017
- Act
- Altered OGA email (“and not a source”)
- Who was hit
- Carter Page / Crossfire Hurricane FISA process
- Higher court
- Stood as admitted conduct in plea
- Ethics hook
- Softened the source problem for a FISA renewal
Kevin E. Clinesmith
Former Assistant General Counsel, FBI OGC · D.C. Bar 984265 · case-file commentary · primary sources
Power box
- Office
- Former Assistant General Counsel, FBI Office of General Counsel (National Security and Cyber Law Branch)
- Appointed / role
- Career FBI OGC lawyer (Jul 12, 2015 – Sep 21, 2019 per plea / Bar)
- Strongest official act
- Jun 2017 — altered OGA/CIA liaison email by adding that Individual #1 (Carter Page) was “and not a source,” forwarded to SSA for fourth FISA application
- Who reversed / higher court
- Criminal case stood; sentenced by Boasberg Jan 29, 2021; D.C. Court of Appeals suspended license Sep 2, 2021 (21-BG-18)
- Softest sentence
- 12 months’ probation (+ $100 assessment); 400 hours community service = widely reported — label if not on judgment PDF
- Hardest act
- Felony false-statement plea §1001(a)(3) Aug 19, 2020
- Recusal
- N/A (defendant)
- Complaints
- D.C. Bar discipline — suspension nunc pro tunc; later restoration is reporting (JTN) unless primary PDF found
- Last checked
- Sep 9, 2026 (MT)
- Promise
- Every Fact sentence has a primary PDF or official record
Quick file
- Identity: Kevin E. Clinesmith · D.C. Bar Registration No. 984265.
- FBI OGC: Assistant General Counsel, National Security and Cyber Law Branch, Jul 12, 2015 – Sep 21, 2019 (plea / Bar).
- Case: United States v. Clinesmith, 1:20-cr-00165 (D.D.C.), Judge James E. Boasberg.
- Plea: Aug 19, 2020 — guilty to one count, 18 U.S.C. §1001(a)(3).
- Sentence: Jan 29, 2021 — 12 months’ probation + $100 special assessment (judgment Feb 2, 2021).
- Bar: Sep 2, 2021 — D.C. Court of Appeals one-year suspension nunc pro tunc to Aug 25, 2020 (21-BG-18).
- Canonical site: kevinclinesmith.com.
He altered a CIA liaison email used on the fourth Carter Page FISA application, pleaded guilty to a false statement, and received twelve months’ probation from the same D.D.C. judge who was then the FISA court’s presiding judge.
Pattern
Thesis the table forces: an FBI lawyer who softened a source problem for a FISA renewal, then took a soft landing while the FISC’s own presiding judge sat on the criminal case.
Swipe for all columns →
| Date | Act | Whose process / party | Higher-court / result | Ethics hook |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15–19, 2017 | Altered OGA email (“and not a source”) | Carter Page / Crossfire Hurricane FISA process | Stood as admitted conduct in plea | Softened the source problem for a FISA renewal |
| Jun 29, 2017 | Fourth FISA application used the altered writing (SSA reliance per plea) | Page FISA #4 | Stood in plea record | Government relied on the altered email in court papers to the FISC |
| Aug 19, 2020 | Guilty plea §1001(a)(3) before Boasberg | Durham prosecution | Judgment entered | Admitted altering the email |
| Jan 29, 2021 | Sentenced to 12 months’ probation | Durham asked for time inside guidelines | Sentence stood | Soft landing while Boasberg was FISC presiding |
| Sep 2, 2021 | D.C. Court of Appeals suspension (21-BG-18) | Bar discipline | Order stood (restoration later = reporting until primary) | License consequence after the plea |
- Date
- Jun 29, 2017
- Act
- Fourth FISA application used the altered writing (SSA reliance per plea)
- Who was hit
- Page FISA #4
- Higher court
- Stood in plea record
- Ethics hook
- Government relied on the altered email in court papers to the FISC
- Date
- Aug 19, 2020
- Act
- Guilty plea §1001(a)(3) before Boasberg
- Who was hit
- Durham prosecution
- Higher court
- Judgment entered
- Ethics hook
- Admitted altering the email
- Date
- Jan 29, 2021
- Act
- Sentenced to 12 months’ probation
- Who was hit
- Durham asked for time inside guidelines
- Higher court
- Sentence stood
- Ethics hook
- Soft landing while Boasberg was FISC presiding
- Date
- Sep 2, 2021
- Act
- D.C. Court of Appeals suspension (21-BG-18)
- Who was hit
- Bar discipline
- Higher court
- Order stood (restoration later = reporting until primary)
- Ethics hook
- License consequence after the plea
Episodes
Altered OGA email — “and not a source”
What happened
On June 15, 2017, Clinesmith emailed an other-government-agency (OGA) liaison asking whether Individual #1 was a source. The liaison replied the same day. On June 19, after instant messages with the supervisory special agent who would be the affiant on FISA #4, Clinesmith forwarded a version of that reply with the added words “and not a source.” The statement of offense says the original did not contain those words. Individual #1 is the filing’s term; public reporting identifies that person as Carter Page.
Timeline
- Jun 15, 2017 — Clinesmith asks OGA liaison whether Individual #1 is a source; liaison replies.
- Jun 19, 2017 — Instant messages with SSA; Clinesmith forwards the altered OGA email.
- Jun 29, 2017 — FISA #4 filed; SSA relied on the altered email (per plea).
Their words
“The defendant had altered the original June 15, 2017 email from the OGA Liaison by adding the words “and not a source” to the email, thus making it appear that the OGA Liaison had written in the email that Individual #1 was “not a source” for the OGA.” Statement of Offense in Support of Guilty Plea, United States v. Clinesmith, No. 1:20-cr-00165 (D.D.C.), Aug 19, 2020
Scope
One false writing: the altered email. Not a standalone count titled “FISA fraud.” The plea is not a finding that Page committed a crime.
Higher court
Admitted conduct in the plea; later judgment and Bar discipline rest on this writing.
Commentary
- Primary: Statement of Offense PDF · Archive copy · Wayback
- DOJ PR: justice.gov · Wayback
FISA #4 — SSA reliance on the altered writing
What happened
There were four court-approved FISA applications targeting Individual #1. FISA #4 was approved June 29, 2017, and expired September 22, 2017. Per the statement of offense, the SSA, relying on Clinesmith’s altered email, signed and submitted FISA #4; that application did not include Individual #1’s history or status with the OGA.
Timeline
- Oct 21, 2016 — FISA #1 approved.
- Jan 12, 2017 — FISA #2; Apr 7, 2017 — FISA #3.
- Jun 19, 2017 — Altered email forwarded to SSA.
- Jun 29, 2017 — FISA #4 approved.
Their words
“Relying on the altered email, the SSA signed and submitted the application to the Court on June 29, 2017. The application for FISA #4 did not include Individual #1’s history or status with the OGA.” Statement of Offense, United States v. Clinesmith, No. 1:20-cr-00165 (D.D.C.)
Scope
The plea records that the government relied on the altered writing in court papers to the FISC. It does not re-litigate whether the FISC would have denied #4 on a complete record — that is outside this file’s Fact block.
Higher court
Stood in the plea record. Separate FISC candor remedial work (Misc. 19-02) is on the Boasberg companion file.
Commentary
The affiant asked for something in writing. He got a doctored email. The fourth warrant went up without the OGA source history the plea says should have been disclosed. That is how a three-word edit becomes a FISA problem — still a false-statement count, not a magic “forged FISA” label.
- Primary: Statement of Offense PDF · Archive copy · Wayback
- CourtListener docket: United States v. Clinesmith
Guilty plea — §1001(a)(3)
What happened
On August 19, 2020, Kevin E. Clinesmith pleaded guilty before Judge James E. Boasberg to one count of making a false statement, 18 U.S.C. §1001(a)(3), for altering and using the OGA email. The United States Attorney’s Office (USAO-CT / Durham) announced the plea the same day.
Timeline
- Aug 19, 2020 — Information / Statement of Offense; guilty plea accepted.
- Dec 3, 2020 — Government sentencing memorandum (Doc. 22) filed.
- Jan 29, 2021 — Sentencing.
Their words
DOJ: “FBI Attorney Admits Altering Email Used in FISA Application During ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ Investigation.” Counsel Justin Shur’s regret statement (“Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email…”) appears in contemporaneous news reporting; this site does not host a hearing transcript.
Scope
One-count Information. Felony false statement. Not a conspiracy verdict. Not a finding that “Spygate goes higher.”
Higher court
Plea accepted; judgment followed. No vacatur located for this file.
Commentary
He admitted it. One count. The machine’s lawyer cut a corner on a Page FISA email and said so in open court. Everything else — scapegoat theories, “goes higher” columns — is packaging until a primary says otherwise.
- DOJ PR: justice.gov · Wayback
- Primary: Statement of Offense PDF · Archive copy
- CourtListener: docket
Sentencing — 12 months’ probation
What happened
On January 29, 2021, Boasberg sentenced Clinesmith to 12 months’ probation and a $100 special assessment. Judgment entered February 2, 2021. The government’s sentencing memorandum (Doc. 22) stated a Guidelines range of zero to six months and asked for incarceration at least between the middle and upper end of that range. Boasberg was FISC’s presiding judge from January 2020 through May 2021, including on the day of the sentence — calendar fact.
Timeline
- Dec 3, 2020 — Government Doc. 22 sentencing memo (0–6 month range; ask for incarceration inside that range).
- Jan 29, 2021 — Sentence: 12 months’ probation + $100 assessment.
- Feb 2, 2021 — Judgment entered.
Their words
Government memo: “a sentence of incarceration that is at least between the middle and upper end of the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range is appropriate and warranted” (range zero to six months). News outlets (NPR, Fox) reported 400 hours of community service; that term is widely reported and is labeled reporting here unless located on the judgment PDF.
Scope
Probation after a felony false-statement plea. Soft relative to the government’s request for time inside the guideline range. FISC-presiding overlap is dates on a calendar, not a finding of coordination.
Higher court
Sentence stood; no vacatur located for this file.
Commentary
Durham asked for time. Boasberg gave probation. The same judge was then the FISA court’s presiding judge — the court that had already found government candor failures on Page. Soft landing for the FBI lawyer who cut the corner. No invented handshake. No second crime by the judge. Just the calendar, the court, and the sentence sitting next to each other. That is the tell. Keep “forged FISA / illegal spy warrant” off the Fact block.
- Primary: Sentencing memo Doc. 22 PDF · Archive copy · Wayback
- CourtListener docket: United States v. Clinesmith
- Companion: jamesboasberg.com — Clinesmith sentence packet
D.C. Bar suspension — 21-BG-18
What happened
On September 2, 2021, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals suspended Kevin E. Clinesmith, Bar Registration No. 984265, from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for one year, nunc pro tunc to August 25, 2020. The negotiated discipline rested on the §1001(a)(3) guilty plea. The Hearing Committee found a serious crime in violation of D.C. Bar R. XI, §10(d), but not moral turpitude; misconduct under Rules 8.4(b) and (c).
Timeline
- Aug 25, 2020 — Self-reported conviction to Disciplinary Counsel (nunc pro tunc start).
- Aug 11, 2021 — Hearing Committee report approving negotiated discipline.
- Sep 2, 2021 — Court of Appeals order: one-year suspension nunc pro tunc to Aug 25, 2020.
Their words
“ORDERED that Respondent Kevin E. Clinesmith is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for one year nunc pro tunc to August 25, 2020.” D.C. Court of Appeals, In re Kevin E. Clinesmith, No. 21-BG-18 (Sep 2, 2021) (per curiam)
Scope
License consequence after the felony plea. One-year suspension backdated so most of it had already run. Later claims that standing was restored are reporting (Just the News / RealClearInvestigations) until a primary restoration PDF is on this file.
Higher court
This is the D.C. Court of Appeals order. It stood as written.
Commentary
A year, backdated so most of it was already served. Serious crime, they said — just not the kind that is moral turpitude. That is how a bar treats an FBI lawyer who altered a FISA email in this town. Restoration headlines without a primary PDF stay in Claims.
- Primary: 21-BG-18 PDF (D.C. Bar ServeFile) · Archive copy
- Primary: Hearing Committee disciplinary PDF · Archive copy
Claims not found as findings
Reporting, adjectives, and hypotheses — not upgraded to Fact findings on this page.
- Bar restored (JTN / RCI) December 2021 Just the News / RealClearInvestigations items about restored D.C. standing are secondary reporting. No primary restoration PDF located for this file.
- Bondi hearing clip RealClearPolitics / hearing-clip packaging that names Clinesmith. Clip ≠ court finding.
- Sean Davis / Federalist adjectives Selected commentary on Bar restoration and related packaging — not Fact.
- “Goes higher” columns Federalist, RCP, and similar hypotheses that the plea proves a wider plot. Hypothesis ≠ finding.
- Instant-message slogans IM chatter without a primary URL tying it to the count of conviction. Not treated as the crime.
- “Forged FISA” / “illegal spy warrant” Adjectives. The conviction is §1001(a)(3) for an altered email. Keep those phrases off Fact blocks.
- 400 hours community service Widely reported (NPR, Fox, others). Not upgraded to Fact from a judgment PDF on this file; labeled reporting in the sentencing packet.
- Coordination with Boasberg Calendar overlap (FISC-presiding + sentencing judge) is Fact. Invented coordination is not.
See also
- jamesboasberg.com — sentencing judge / FISC-presiding overlap
- joepientka.com — Crossfire Hurricane / Page-track companion (if owned)
- marymccord.com — thin FISC / NSD crossover
- totetray.com — network index
Sources
- Statement of Offense / plea agreement (NYT DocumentCloud mirror). Primary: PDF · Archive copy · Wayback
- DOJ USAO-CT. Plea press release, Aug 19, 2020. justice.gov · Wayback
- CourtListener. United States v. Clinesmith, 1:20-cr-00165 (D.D.C.). courtlistener.com
- Government sentencing memorandum (RECAP Doc. 22). Primary: PDF · Archive copy · Wayback
- D.C. Court of Appeals. In re Kevin E. Clinesmith, No. 21-BG-18 (Sep 2, 2021). Primary: PDF · Archive copy
- D.C. Bar Hearing Committee. Negotiated discipline report (21-ND-004 / HCKevinEClinesmith21ND004). Primary: PDF · Archive copy
Changelog
2026-09-09 — v1.5 chrome: rebuilt as one-page power-file from jamesboasberg.com patterns. Fact/Commentary badges, mobile Pattern cards, archive copies beside primary PDFs, sticky jump bar, Person+Article schema. Old posts/* moved to _archive/posts/ with path redirects into episode anchors. No X embeds. No stock mood photos on index.
Corrections
If a Fact sentence is wrong, write hello@kevinclinesmith.com with the primary source. We will correct the page. Allegations and commentary stay labeled.
He did not invent a new FISA from scratch. He took a CIA liaison email, added three words that flipped the source answer, and sent it to the affiant. That is the crime of conviction. Call the soft landing soft. Do not write “forged FISA” as Fact — the count is false statement on an altered email.