Clinesmith

Kevin E. Clinesmith

Former Assistant General Counsel, FBI OGC · D.C. Bar 984265 · case-file commentary · primary sources

Power box

Office
Former Assistant General Counsel, FBI Office of General Counsel (National Security and Cyber Law Branch)
Appointed / role
Career FBI OGC lawyer (Jul 12, 2015 – Sep 21, 2019 per plea / Bar)
Strongest official act
Jun 2017 — altered OGA/CIA liaison email by adding that Individual #1 (Carter Page) was “and not a source,” forwarded to SSA for fourth FISA application
Who reversed / higher court
Criminal case stood; sentenced by Boasberg Jan 29, 2021; D.C. Court of Appeals suspended license Sep 2, 2021 (21-BG-18)
Softest sentence
12 months’ probation (+ $100 assessment); 400 hours community service = widely reported — label if not on judgment PDF
Hardest act
Felony false-statement plea §1001(a)(3) Aug 19, 2020
Recusal
N/A (defendant)
Complaints
D.C. Bar discipline — suspension nunc pro tunc; later restoration is reporting (JTN) unless primary PDF found
Last checked
Sep 9, 2026 (MT)
Promise
Every Fact sentence has a primary PDF or official record

Quick file

  1. Identity: Kevin E. Clinesmith · D.C. Bar Registration No. 984265.
  2. FBI OGC: Assistant General Counsel, National Security and Cyber Law Branch, Jul 12, 2015 – Sep 21, 2019 (plea / Bar).
  3. Case: United States v. Clinesmith, 1:20-cr-00165 (D.D.C.), Judge James E. Boasberg.
  4. Plea: Aug 19, 2020 — guilty to one count, 18 U.S.C. §1001(a)(3).
  5. Sentence: Jan 29, 2021 — 12 months’ probation + $100 special assessment (judgment Feb 2, 2021).
  6. Bar: Sep 2, 2021 — D.C. Court of Appeals one-year suspension nunc pro tunc to Aug 25, 2020 (21-BG-18).
  7. Canonical site: kevinclinesmith.com.

He altered a CIA liaison email used on the fourth Carter Page FISA application, pleaded guilty to a false statement, and received twelve months’ probation from the same D.D.C. judge who was then the FISA court’s presiding judge.

Pattern

Thesis the table forces: an FBI lawyer who softened a source problem for a FISA renewal, then took a soft landing while the FISC’s own presiding judge sat on the criminal case.

Swipe for all columns →

Date Act Whose process / party Higher-court / result Ethics hook
Jun 15–19, 2017 Altered OGA email (“and not a source”) Carter Page / Crossfire Hurricane FISA process Stood as admitted conduct in plea Softened the source problem for a FISA renewal
Jun 29, 2017 Fourth FISA application used the altered writing (SSA reliance per plea) Page FISA #4 Stood in plea record Government relied on the altered email in court papers to the FISC
Aug 19, 2020 Guilty plea §1001(a)(3) before Boasberg Durham prosecution Judgment entered Admitted altering the email
Jan 29, 2021 Sentenced to 12 months’ probation Durham asked for time inside guidelines Sentence stood Soft landing while Boasberg was FISC presiding
Sep 2, 2021 D.C. Court of Appeals suspension (21-BG-18) Bar discipline Order stood (restoration later = reporting until primary) License consequence after the plea
Date
Jun 15–19, 2017
Act
Altered OGA email (“and not a source”)
Who was hit
Carter Page / Crossfire Hurricane FISA process
Higher court
Stood as admitted conduct in plea
Ethics hook
Softened the source problem for a FISA renewal
Date
Jun 29, 2017
Act
Fourth FISA application used the altered writing (SSA reliance per plea)
Who was hit
Page FISA #4
Higher court
Stood in plea record
Ethics hook
Government relied on the altered email in court papers to the FISC
Date
Aug 19, 2020
Act
Guilty plea §1001(a)(3) before Boasberg
Who was hit
Durham prosecution
Higher court
Judgment entered
Ethics hook
Admitted altering the email
Date
Jan 29, 2021
Act
Sentenced to 12 months’ probation
Who was hit
Durham asked for time inside guidelines
Higher court
Sentence stood
Ethics hook
Soft landing while Boasberg was FISC presiding
Date
Sep 2, 2021
Act
D.C. Court of Appeals suspension (21-BG-18)
Who was hit
Bar discipline
Higher court
Order stood (restoration later = reporting until primary)
Ethics hook
License consequence after the plea

Episodes

Altered OGA email — “and not a source”

Jun 15–19, 2017 · Statement of Offense · Crossfire Hurricane

What happened

Fact

On June 15, 2017, Clinesmith emailed an other-government-agency (OGA) liaison asking whether Individual #1 was a source. The liaison replied the same day. On June 19, after instant messages with the supervisory special agent who would be the affiant on FISA #4, Clinesmith forwarded a version of that reply with the added words “and not a source.” The statement of offense says the original did not contain those words. Individual #1 is the filing’s term; public reporting identifies that person as Carter Page.

Timeline

Fact
  • Jun 15, 2017 — Clinesmith asks OGA liaison whether Individual #1 is a source; liaison replies.
  • Jun 19, 2017 — Instant messages with SSA; Clinesmith forwards the altered OGA email.
  • Jun 29, 2017 — FISA #4 filed; SSA relied on the altered email (per plea).

Their words

“The defendant had altered the original June 15, 2017 email from the OGA Liaison by adding the words “and not a source” to the email, thus making it appear that the OGA Liaison had written in the email that Individual #1 was “not a source” for the OGA.” Statement of Offense in Support of Guilty Plea, United States v. Clinesmith, No. 1:20-cr-00165 (D.D.C.), Aug 19, 2020

Scope

Fact

One false writing: the altered email. Not a standalone count titled “FISA fraud.” The plea is not a finding that Page committed a crime.

Higher court

Fact

Admitted conduct in the plea; later judgment and Bar discipline rest on this writing.

Commentary

Commentary

He did not invent a new FISA from scratch. He took a CIA liaison email, added three words that flipped the source answer, and sent it to the affiant. That is the crime of conviction. Call the soft landing soft. Do not write “forged FISA” as Fact — the count is false statement on an altered email.

FISA #4 — SSA reliance on the altered writing

Jun 29, 2017 · Fourth Carter Page FISA application

What happened

Fact

There were four court-approved FISA applications targeting Individual #1. FISA #4 was approved June 29, 2017, and expired September 22, 2017. Per the statement of offense, the SSA, relying on Clinesmith’s altered email, signed and submitted FISA #4; that application did not include Individual #1’s history or status with the OGA.

Timeline

Fact
  • Oct 21, 2016 — FISA #1 approved.
  • Jan 12, 2017 — FISA #2; Apr 7, 2017 — FISA #3.
  • Jun 19, 2017 — Altered email forwarded to SSA.
  • Jun 29, 2017 — FISA #4 approved.

Their words

“Relying on the altered email, the SSA signed and submitted the application to the Court on June 29, 2017. The application for FISA #4 did not include Individual #1’s history or status with the OGA.” Statement of Offense, United States v. Clinesmith, No. 1:20-cr-00165 (D.D.C.)

Scope

Fact

The plea records that the government relied on the altered writing in court papers to the FISC. It does not re-litigate whether the FISC would have denied #4 on a complete record — that is outside this file’s Fact block.

Higher court

Fact

Stood in the plea record. Separate FISC candor remedial work (Misc. 19-02) is on the Boasberg companion file.

Commentary

Commentary

The affiant asked for something in writing. He got a doctored email. The fourth warrant went up without the OGA source history the plea says should have been disclosed. That is how a three-word edit becomes a FISA problem — still a false-statement count, not a magic “forged FISA” label.

Guilty plea — §1001(a)(3)

Aug 19, 2020 · Durham prosecution · Judge James E. Boasberg

What happened

Fact

On August 19, 2020, Kevin E. Clinesmith pleaded guilty before Judge James E. Boasberg to one count of making a false statement, 18 U.S.C. §1001(a)(3), for altering and using the OGA email. The United States Attorney’s Office (USAO-CT / Durham) announced the plea the same day.

Timeline

Fact
  • Aug 19, 2020 — Information / Statement of Offense; guilty plea accepted.
  • Dec 3, 2020 — Government sentencing memorandum (Doc. 22) filed.
  • Jan 29, 2021 — Sentencing.

Their words

Fact

DOJ: “FBI Attorney Admits Altering Email Used in FISA Application During ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ Investigation.” Counsel Justin Shur’s regret statement (“Kevin deeply regrets having altered the email…”) appears in contemporaneous news reporting; this site does not host a hearing transcript.

Scope

Fact

One-count Information. Felony false statement. Not a conspiracy verdict. Not a finding that “Spygate goes higher.”

Higher court

Fact

Plea accepted; judgment followed. No vacatur located for this file.

Commentary

Commentary

He admitted it. One count. The machine’s lawyer cut a corner on a Page FISA email and said so in open court. Everything else — scapegoat theories, “goes higher” columns — is packaging until a primary says otherwise.

Sentencing — 12 months’ probation

Jan 29, 2021 · Judgment Feb 2, 2021 · Boasberg / FISC-presiding overlap

What happened

Fact

On January 29, 2021, Boasberg sentenced Clinesmith to 12 months’ probation and a $100 special assessment. Judgment entered February 2, 2021. The government’s sentencing memorandum (Doc. 22) stated a Guidelines range of zero to six months and asked for incarceration at least between the middle and upper end of that range. Boasberg was FISC’s presiding judge from January 2020 through May 2021, including on the day of the sentence — calendar fact.

Timeline

Fact
  • Dec 3, 2020 — Government Doc. 22 sentencing memo (0–6 month range; ask for incarceration inside that range).
  • Jan 29, 2021 — Sentence: 12 months’ probation + $100 assessment.
  • Feb 2, 2021 — Judgment entered.

Their words

Fact

Government memo: “a sentence of incarceration that is at least between the middle and upper end of the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range is appropriate and warranted” (range zero to six months). News outlets (NPR, Fox) reported 400 hours of community service; that term is widely reported and is labeled reporting here unless located on the judgment PDF.

Scope

Fact

Probation after a felony false-statement plea. Soft relative to the government’s request for time inside the guideline range. FISC-presiding overlap is dates on a calendar, not a finding of coordination.

Higher court

Fact

Sentence stood; no vacatur located for this file.

Commentary

Commentary

Durham asked for time. Boasberg gave probation. The same judge was then the FISA court’s presiding judge — the court that had already found government candor failures on Page. Soft landing for the FBI lawyer who cut the corner. No invented handshake. No second crime by the judge. Just the calendar, the court, and the sentence sitting next to each other. That is the tell. Keep “forged FISA / illegal spy warrant” off the Fact block.

D.C. Bar suspension — 21-BG-18

Sep 2, 2021 · D.C. Court of Appeals · Bar No. 984265

What happened

Fact

On September 2, 2021, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals suspended Kevin E. Clinesmith, Bar Registration No. 984265, from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for one year, nunc pro tunc to August 25, 2020. The negotiated discipline rested on the §1001(a)(3) guilty plea. The Hearing Committee found a serious crime in violation of D.C. Bar R. XI, §10(d), but not moral turpitude; misconduct under Rules 8.4(b) and (c).

Timeline

Fact
  • Aug 25, 2020 — Self-reported conviction to Disciplinary Counsel (nunc pro tunc start).
  • Aug 11, 2021 — Hearing Committee report approving negotiated discipline.
  • Sep 2, 2021 — Court of Appeals order: one-year suspension nunc pro tunc to Aug 25, 2020.

Their words

“ORDERED that Respondent Kevin E. Clinesmith is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for one year nunc pro tunc to August 25, 2020.” D.C. Court of Appeals, In re Kevin E. Clinesmith, No. 21-BG-18 (Sep 2, 2021) (per curiam)

Scope

Fact

License consequence after the felony plea. One-year suspension backdated so most of it had already run. Later claims that standing was restored are reporting (Just the News / RealClearInvestigations) until a primary restoration PDF is on this file.

Higher court

Fact

This is the D.C. Court of Appeals order. It stood as written.

Commentary

Commentary

A year, backdated so most of it was already served. Serious crime, they said — just not the kind that is moral turpitude. That is how a bar treats an FBI lawyer who altered a FISA email in this town. Restoration headlines without a primary PDF stay in Claims.

Claims not found as findings

Reporting, adjectives, and hypotheses — not upgraded to Fact findings on this page.

See also

Sources

Primary-first. Last checked Sep 9, 2026 (MT).

  1. Statement of Offense / plea agreement (NYT DocumentCloud mirror). Primary: PDF · Archive copy · Wayback
  2. DOJ USAO-CT. Plea press release, Aug 19, 2020. justice.gov · Wayback
  3. CourtListener. United States v. Clinesmith, 1:20-cr-00165 (D.D.C.). courtlistener.com
  4. Government sentencing memorandum (RECAP Doc. 22). Primary: PDF · Archive copy · Wayback
  5. D.C. Court of Appeals. In re Kevin E. Clinesmith, No. 21-BG-18 (Sep 2, 2021). Primary: PDF · Archive copy
  6. D.C. Bar Hearing Committee. Negotiated discipline report (21-ND-004 / HCKevinEClinesmith21ND004). Primary: PDF · Archive copy

Changelog

2026-09-09 — v1.5 chrome: rebuilt as one-page power-file from jamesboasberg.com patterns. Fact/Commentary badges, mobile Pattern cards, archive copies beside primary PDFs, sticky jump bar, Person+Article schema. Old posts/* moved to _archive/posts/ with path redirects into episode anchors. No X embeds. No stock mood photos on index.

Corrections

If a Fact sentence is wrong, write hello@kevinclinesmith.com with the primary source. We will correct the page. Allegations and commentary stay labeled.